Decades Of Experience Working For You

Why property owners may not be happy with “just compensation”

On Behalf of | May 30, 2025 | Real Estate Transactions |

Eminent domain is the process by which the government can take property that belongs to someone else. For instance, a business owner may have a piece of commercial property right where the government wants to construct a railroad or an interstate highway system. They can use eminent domain to take that land if it’s deemed to be beneficial to the public.

That doesn’t mean that the government is just stealing the land, however. They are essentially forcing a sale. They still have to pay for it, and the landowner deserves just compensation. The difference is just that the landowner may not have the ability to reject the offer. The business owner may not want to sell their real estate at all, whether the price is fair or not, but the government can compel them to do so.

Does this go far enough?

There are often disputes regarding just compensation. The property owner may say that the amount the government is offering is not fair and is far lower than the actual value of the property. Even though they’re getting paid, they do still feel like their land is essentially being stolen.

Part of the reason for this is that people often look at real estate as a long-term investment. Is the company going to earn less without that real estate in its possession, costing them money in the future? Was the real estate going to increase in value over the next 10 years, and so the property owner is now losing out on that increase by being forced to sell early?

These are just a few of the issues that can come up when trying to determine how much compensation is necessary. Those working through this process need to be well aware of all their legal options.